arrow_backAll guidesMore in Pick material
Technical guidePre-release7 min + 22 min technical review·June 4, 2026·FerraLink Materials Engineering

CVD Diamond Submounts: When Single-Crystal SiC Is Not Enough

How CVD diamond heat spreaders fit above SiC in the thermal ladder — 1,500–2,200 W/m·K in-plane conductivity, stack design for ~1 ppm/°C CTE, and when extreme power density justifies FerraLink's pre-release diamond program.

Transparent CVD polycrystalline diamond heat spreader disc — optical-grade thermal tile
Transparent CVD polycrystalline diamond heat spreader disc — optical-grade thermal tile

Quick answer

Consider CVD diamond submount heat spreaders when single-crystal SiC at 350–400 W/m·K still leaves junction overshoot or hotspot ΔT above your margin — typically above ~150 W/cm² peak density, multi-kW laser bars, or sub-mm GaN RF hotspots. Diamond is not a drop-in ALN/SiC replacement; it requires an engineered carrier stack and scoped attach process.


Next step

Validate your stack in the Submount Advisor

Free

Work email unlocks free thermal validation on your die size — part number, failure screening, and spec PDF in ~30 seconds.

  • Thermal profileJunction temperature & 3D steady-state field for your die geometry
  • Failure screeningIndicative AuSn fatigue, die stress, and warpage before you lock the BOM
  • Any footprintEnter dimensions — part number & stack layout generated in real time
  • Spec sheet PDFQuote-ready export included with your advisor session
Submount Advisor — thermal profile, failure screening, and customized part number from your die dimensions
Your dimensions → thermal field → part number & spec PDF

What most teams do next on a submount program

At some point the work stops being “which material in general” and becomes a drawing, a first lot, and attach data on your line. Where you are in that sequence usually picks the path — not a package brochure.

  1. 1

    You already have a drawing you trust

    Stack is frozen — maybe a repeat build, maybe a straight swap on geometry you have run before. You send the drawing (or catalog part number), we build to print, and you qualify on the bench or go straight to a pilot quantity.

    Fits: AlN or SiC submounts, pre-deposited AuSn, standard copper DPC.

    Usually fits when: Best when you are comfortable owning the stack and only need parts.

    $50–$500 · 2–4 weeks

    Order samples or request a build quote

    We’ll confirm drawing fit, pricing, and lead time before you commit.

    Next step: Upload your drawing (DXF, Gerber, or STEP) or paste a catalog part number on the RFQ form — we reply within about two business days with quote and lead time.

    Browse catalog evaluation samples

  2. 2

    You are changing material or stack details — want a drawing and feasibility check first

    Common when moving from an AlN reference to SiC (or the other way): same rough intent, different conductivity, pad rules, and thickness. You may have an old drawing that does not translate literally. Here teams usually want a conversion layout, thermal/stress screening against your power and cycling targets, and a clear pass/fail before they cut metal or commit to a large sample order.

    Usually fits when: Typical first project with us when the stack is new to your team or to SiC/AlN in this footprint.

    from $2,500 · 2–3 weeks

    Most first-time engagements land here. After you have a released drawing and data from us, repeat builds are usually drawing-in — no second study unless the die or duty cycle moves.

    If you’ve run Submount Advisor, attach the export or paste the summary so we start from the same scenario.

    Request Focused Analysis scope & quote

    Fixed-scope SOW and price before engineering starts.

    Next step: Send your existing drawing or target die size + peak power on the intake form — we return a written scope and fixed price for the study.

  3. 3

    The die or program is still moving — you need a development plan

    Emitter geometry, power level, or reliability targets are not fixed yet. You need a DOE plan (what to build each run and why), analysis between runs, and drawings that stay inside our process window — scoped as a multi-run program on top of sample and NRE costs.

    Usually fits when: When iteration and test planning are the bottleneck, not a single drawing release.

    $10,000+ (scoped) · 6–10+ weeks

    Discuss a DOE + first-build plan

    Scoped program plan and budget before any build slots are reserved.

    Next step: Share a short brief (die, power, what you’re trying to learn) — we’ll schedule a 15–30 min call or reply by email with a proposed DOE outline and ballpark.

Still narrowing AlN vs SiC before any drawing work? Stack Scoping ($750–$1,250) is a lighter memo — material pick and geometry bands only, without full feasibility sign-off.

Not sure which bucket you are in? Send what you have — past drawing, Advisor export, or a short note on die and power — and we will point you to the smallest step that actually moves the program. Contact engineering